A30249:147
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the…Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the…
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the errors of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the errours of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...
London: printed by James Young for Thomas Underhill, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Nor is this shuffling and uncertainty any new thing; for the old and first Antinomian did many ⟨p. 52⟩times promise amendment, and yet afterwards fell to his error again; after that he condemned his error, and recanted his error in a public Auditory, and printed his revocation, yet, when Luther was dead, he relapsed into that error: so hard a thing it is to get poison out, when it's once swallowed down.
Nor is this shufling and uncertainty any new thing; for the old and first Antinomian did many ⟨p. 52⟩times promise amendment, and yet afterwards fell to his errour again; after that he condemned his errour, and recanted his errour in a publike Auditory, and printed his revocation, yet, when Luther was dead, hee relapsed into that errour: so hard a thing it is to get poison out, when it's once swallowed downe.
In the fourth place we come to lay down those things that may clear the meaning of the Apostle: and first know, that humane Authors, who yet have acknowledged the help of precepts, do speak thus much of a righteous man, only to show this, that he doth that which is righteous, for love of righteousness, not for fear of punishment: As Aquinas said of his love to God, Amo, quia amo; & amo, ut amem. Thus Seneca, Ad Legem esse bonum exiguum est: It's a poor small thing to be good only according to the law. And so Aristotle, lib. 3. Polit. cap. 9. showeth how a righteous man would be good, though there were no law; as they say of a Magistrate, he ought to be [Greek or Hebrew], a living law. Thus Socrates said of the Civill Law, [Greek or Hebrew] And Plato, Polit. 3. [Greek or Hebrew], It is not fit to command or make laws for those that are good. These Sayings are not altogether true, yet they have some kind of truth in them. Hence it was that Antisthenes said, A wise man was not bound by any laws: And Demonax told a Lawyer, that all their laws would come to nothing; for good men did not need them, and wicked men would not be the better for them. And as the Heathens have said thus, so the Fathers: Hierome, What needs the Law say to a righteous man, Thou shalt not kill, to whom it's not permitted to be angry? Yet we see David, though a righteous man, needed this precept. But especially Chrysostom, even from these words, doth wonderfully hyperbolize, A righteous man needs not the Law, no not teaching or admonishing; yea, he disdains to be warned by it, he doth not wait or stay to learn of it. As therefore a Musician or Grammarian, that hath these arts within him, scorns the Grammar, or to go to look to the rules; so doth a righteous man. Now these are but hyperbole's; for what godly man is there, that needs not the Word as a light, that needs it not as a goad? Indeed, in heaven the godly shall not need the Law; no more shall they the Gospel, or the whole Word of God.