A30249:55
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the…Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the…
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the errors of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the errours of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...
London: printed by James Young for Thomas Underhill, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. Though Christ hath obeyed the Law fully, yet that doth not exempt 1us from our obedience to it, for other ends then he did it. And, I think, that if the Antinomian did fully inform himself in this thing, there were an agreement: for, we all ought to be zealous against those Pharisaical and Popish practices of setting up any thing in us, though wrought by the grace of God, as the matter of our justification. But herein they do not distinguish, or well argue: The works of the Law do not justify, therefore they are needless, or not requisite: for (say they) if Christ hath fully obeyed the righteousness of the Law, and that is made ours; therefore it is not what ours is, but what Christs is. This would be a good consequence, if we were to obey the Law for the same end Christ did, but that is far for us. I have heard indeed some doubt, whether the maintaining of Christs active obedience imputed to us, doth not necessarily imply Antinomianism: but of that ⟨p. 15⟩more hereafter; only let them lay a parallel with Christs passive obedience. He satisfied the curse and threatening of the Law, and thereby hath freed us from all punishment; yet the Believers have afflictions for other ends: so do we the works of Gods Law, for other ends then Christ did them.
4. Though Christ hath obeyed the Law fully, yet that doth not exempt 1us from our obedience to it, for other ends then he did it. And, I think, that if the Antinomian did fully inform himself in this thing, there were an agreement: for, we all ought to be zealous against those Pharisaicall and Popish practices of setting up any thing in us, though wrought by the grace of God, as the matter of our justification. But herein they do not distinguish, or well argue: The works of the Law do not justifie, therefore they are needlesse, or not requisite: for (say they) if Christ hath fully obeyed the righteousnesse of the Law, and that is made ours; therefore it is not what ours is, but what Christs is. This would be a good consequence, if we were to obey the Law for the same end Christ did, but that is farre for us. I have heard indeed some doubt, whether the maintaining of Christs active obedience imputed to us, doth not necessarily imply Antinomianisme: but of that ⟨p. 15⟩