A32723:290
Discourses upon the Existence and Attributes of God
Several discourses upon the existence and attributes of God by that late eminent minister in Christ, Mr. Stephen Charnocke ...
London: printed for D. Newman, 1682
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
It is said, Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, Gen. 4.16. That is, from the Worship of God. Our refusing or abhorring the presence of a man implies a carelessness whether he continue in the World or no: Tis a using him, as if he had no being, or as if we were not concerned in it. Hence all men in Adam, under the Emblem of the prodigal, are said to go into a far Country. Not in respect of place, because of Gods Omnipresence; but in respect of acknowledgement and affection; they mind and love any thing but God. And the descriptions of the Nations of the world, lying in the Ruins of Adams fall, and the dregs of that revolt, is that they know not God: They forget God, as if there were no such being above them; and indeed he that doth the works of the Devil, owns the Devil to be more worthy of observance, and consequently of a being, than God, whose nature he forgets and whose presence he abhors.
It is said, Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, Gen. 4.16. That is, from the Worship of God. Our refusing or abhorring the presence of a man implies a carelessness whether he continue in the World or no: Tis a using him, as if he had no being, or as if we were not concerned in it. Hence all men in Adam, under the Emblem of the prodigal, are said to go into a far Country. Not in respect of place, because of Gods Omnipresence; but in respect of acknowledgment and affection; they mind and love any thing but God. And the descriptions of the Nations of the world, lying in the Ruines of Adams fall, and the dregs of that revolt, is that they know not God: They forget God, as if there were no such being above them; and indeed he that doth the works of the Devil, owns the Devil to be more worthy of observance, and consequently of a being, than God, whose nature he forgets and whose presence he abhors.
Proposition, 4. Every sin in its own nature would render God a foolish and impure being. Many Transgressors esteem their acts, which are contrary to the Law of God, both Wise and Good: If so, the Law against which they are committed, must be both foolish and impure: What a reflection is there then upon the Law-giver? The Moral Law is not properly a mere act of Gods Will considered in it self, or a Tyrannical Edict, like those of whom it may well be said, stat pro ratione voluntas: But it commands those things, which are good in their own nature, and prohibits those things, which are in their own nature evil; and therefore is an act of his Wisdom and Righteousness; the result of his wise Council, and an extract of his pure nature; as all the Laws of just Law-givers, are not only the acts of their Will, but of a Will governed by Reason and Justice, and for the good of the public, whereof they are conservators. If the Moral commands of God were only acts of his Will, and had not an intrinsic necessity, reason and goodness, God might have commanded the quite contrary, and made a contrary Law, whereby that which we now call Vice, might have been canonized for Virtue: He might then have forbid any Worship of him, Love to him, fear of his name: He might then have commanded Murders, Thefts, Adulteries. In the first he would have untied the link of duty from the Creature, and dissolved the obligations of Creatures to him, which is impossible to be conceived; for from the Relation of a Creature to God, obligations to God, and duties upon those obligations, do necessarily result. It had been against the rule of Goodness and Justice, to have commanded the Creature not to love him, and fear and obey him: This had been a command against Righteousness, Goodness, and intrinsic obligations to Gratitude: And should Murder, Adulteries, Rapines have been commanded instead of the contrary, God would have destroyed his own Creation; he would have acted against the rule of goodness and order; he had been an unjust tyrannical Governor of the world: Public society would have been cracked in pieces, and the world become a Shambles, a Brothel House, a place below the common sentiments of a mere man. All sin therefore being against the Law of God, the Wisdom and holy rectitude of Gods Nature is denied in every Act of disobedience: