4. This Universal Consent is not prejudiced by some few Dissenters. History doth not reckon twenty profest Atheists in all Ages in the compass of the whole World:1 and we have not the name of any one absolute Atheist upon Record in Scripture: yet it is questioned, whether any of them, noted in History with that infamous name, were down-right deniers of the Existence of God, but rather because they disparaged the Deities commonly worshipped by the Nations where they lived, as being of a clearer reason to discern, that those qualities, vulgarly attributed to their gods, as lust and luxury, wantonness and quarrels, were unworthy of the nature of a God. But suppose they were really what they are termed to be, what are they to the multitude of men, that have sprung out of the loins of Adam? not so much as one grain of ashes is to all that were ever turned into that form by any fires in your Chimneys. And many more were not sufficient to weigh down the contrary consent of the whole World, and bear down an universal impression. Should the Laws of a Country, agreed universally to, by the whole Body of the People be accounted vain, because a hundred men of those millions disapprove of them, when not their reason, but their folly and base interest, persuades them to dislike them and dispute against them?* What if some men be blind, shall any conclude from thence that eyes are not natural to men? shall we say that the notion of the Existence of God is not natural to men, because a very small number have been of a contrary opinion? shall a man in a dungeon, that never saw the Sun, deny that there is a Sun, because one or two blind men tell him there is none, when thousands assure him there is? Why should then the exceptions of a few, not one to millions, discredit that which is voted certainly true by the joint consent of the World? Add this too, that if those that are reported to be Atheists had had any considerable reason to step aside from the common persuasion of the whole world, 'tis a wonder it met not with entertainment by great numbers of those, who, by reason of their notorious wickedness, and inward disquiets, might reasonably be thought to wish in their hearts that there were no God.
4. This Ʋniversal Consent is not prejudiced by some few Dissenters. History doth not reckon twenty profest Atheists in all Ages in the compass of the whole World:1 and we have not the name of any one absolute Atheist upon Record in Scripture: yet it is questioned, whether any of them, noted in History with that infamous name, were down-right denyers of the Existence of God, but rather because they disparaged the Deities commonly worshipped by the Nations where they lived, as being of a clearer reason to discern, that those qualities, vulgarly attributed to their gods, as lust and luxury, wantonness and quarrels, were unworthy of the nature of a God. But suppose they were really what they are termed to be, what are they to the multitude of men, that have sprung out of the loyns of Adam? not so much as one grain of ashes is to all that were ever turned into that form by any fires in your Chimnies. And many more were not sufficient to weigh down the contrary consent of the whole World, and bear down an universal impression. Should the Laws of a Country, agreed universally to, by the whole Body of the People be accounted vain, because a hundred men of those millions disapprove of them, when not their reason, but their folly and base interest, perswades them to dislike them and dispute against them?* What if some men be blind, shall any conclude from thence that eyes are not natural to men? shall we say that the notion of the Existence of God is not natural to men, because a very small number have been of a contrary opinion? shall a man in a dungeon, that never saw the Sun, deny that there is a Sun, because one or two blind men tell him there is none, when thousands assure him there is? Why should then the exceptions of a few, not one to millions, discredit that which is voted certainly true by the joynt consent of the World? Add this too, that if those that are reported to be Atheists had had any considerable reason to step aside from the common perswasion of the whole world, 'tis a wonder it met not with entertainment by great numbers of those, who, by reason of their notorious wickedness, and inward disquiets, might reasonably be thought to wish in their hearts that there were no God.
- 1Gassend. Phys. § 1. lib. 4. cap. 7. p. 282.
- *Gassend. ibid. p. 290.
