A34689:4253
A practical commentary, or an exposition with observations, reasons, and uses upon the first…A practicall commentary, or an exposition with observations, reasons, and vses upon the first…
A practical commentary, or an exposition with observations, reasons, and uses upon the first Epistle general of John by ... John Cotton ...A practicall commentary, or an exposition with observations, reasons, and vses upon the first Epistle generall of John by ... John Cotton ...
London: printed by M.S. for Thomas Parkhurst, 1658
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Reas. […] not his life […] against his Brother Herod […] loose form […] at […] of Gods […] our Breth•• […] cannot […] from […] from the other.
Reas. 〈…〉 not his life 〈…〉 against his Brother Herod 〈…〉 loose form 〈…〉 at 〈…〉 of Gods 〈…〉 our Breth•• 〈…〉 cannot 〈…〉 from 〈…〉 from the other.
[…] love of God is an evidence that we love […] Brethren, so•• a […] not God, •e so was not his Brother, […] be for self […] on […] grounds, and its […] civill love not a […] Brother love. 2 […] 10.•5, 16. For Je••• […] King, so […] with […], a good man, he would think it […], but […] it was that he might […] zeal for the Lord […], and to w••k out […] •ands. So […] no means part […] Jacob was not this great love? No, he […] found it did advantage his estate.
〈…〉 love of God is an evidence that we love 〈…〉 Brethren, so•• a 〈…〉 not God, •e so was not his Brother, be for selfe on grounds, and its civill love not a Brother love. 2 10.5, 16. For Je King, so with , a good man, he would think it , but it was that he might zeal for the Lord , and to wk out ands. So no means part Jacob was not this great love? No, he found it did advantage his estate.