A35439:1518
An exposition with practical observations continued upon the eighth, ninth and tenth chapters of…An exposition with practicall observations continued upon the eighth, ninth and tenth chapters of…
An exposition with practical observations continued upon the eighth, ninth and tenth chapters of the book of Job being the sum of thirty two lectures, delivered at Magnus near the bridge, London / by Joseph Caryl ...An exposition with practicall observations continued upon the eighth, ninth and tenth chapters of the book of Job being the summe of thirty two lectures, delivered at Magnus neer the bridge, London / by Joseph Caryl ...
London: printed by A. Miller for Henry Overton, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But how shall we fit this to the business in hand? Will the Lord thus scorn and deride at the trial and probation of the innocent?
But how shall we fit this to the businesse in hand? Will the Lord thus scorn and deride at the triall and probation of the innocent?
The Vulgar was it seems so much straitened to make out the sense that he reads it negatively, If the scourge slay suddenly, he will not laugh at the trial of the innocent. Others, though they put not in a negation formally and in terms, yet they do it equivalently, and therefore they render it by an interrogation, If the scourge slay suddenly, Will he laugh at the trial of the innocent? No, he will not, that's their meaning: the Lord will not sleight or neglect the trial of the innocent, though he destroys them, yet he will not deride ⟨p. 316⟩them. But we, and most of the learned Hebritians, keep close to the affirmative, If the scourge slay suddenly, he will laugh at the trial of the innocent.
The Vulgar was it seems so much straitned to make out the sense that he reads it negatively, If the scourge slay suddenly, he will not laugh at the triall of the innocent. Others, though they put not in a negation formally and in terms, yet they doe it equivalently, and therefore they render it by an interrogation, If the scourge slay suddenly, Will he laugh at the triall of the innocent? No, he will not, that's their meaning: the Lord will not sleight or neglect the triall of the innocent, though he destroies them, yet he will not deride ⟨p. 316⟩them. But we, and most of the learned Hebritians, keep close to the affirmative, If the scourge slay suddenly, he will laugh at the triall of the innocent.