The harmony of the Gospels in the holy history of the humiliation and sufferings…

3. He backs his smiting him with a Reproach, Answerest thou the high Priest so? As if he had made a faulty Answer, dishonourable to the high Priest. But he showeth that he put a bad construction on his speech, and imputes it to him as a Reproach.

3. He backs his smiting him with a Reproach, Answerest thou the high Priest so? As if he had made a faulty Answer, dishonourable to the high Priest. But he sheweth that he put a bad construction on his speech, and imputes it to him as a Reproach.

4. All this was done in the face of the Court, without any check given him that we hear of; showing that they were all conspired to abuse our Lord Jesus. See a like example of this abuse done unto our Lord Jesus. 1 King. 22.24. And Zedekiah the Son of Chenaanan went near and smote Micaiah on the cheek, and said, Which way went the Spirit of the Lord from me to speak unto thee?

4. All this was done in the face of the Court, without any check given him that we hear of; shewing that they were all conspired to abuse our Lord Jesus. See a like example of this abuse done unto our Lord Jesus. 1 King. 22.24. And Zedekiah the Son of Chenaanan went neer and smote Micaiah on the cheek, and said, Which way went the Spirit of the Lord from me to speak unto thee?

To this saucy fellow Jesus answered with a convincing and reproving Dilemma, so clear, and so wisely placed, that he spake above exception. The first part or horn of t•e Dilemma is this, If I have spoken evil, show it, bear witness of it. The second part or horn is, if I have spoken well, why smitest thou me? Which answer of our Lord, quite stopped their mouths, and put all to silence.