A41330:103
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Here Dr. Goodman proves us to be guilty of Judaism, telling his Reader, p. 69 this is their grand Hypothesis, That nothing is lawful in the service of God, but what is expressly prescribed in Scripture. Such an Hypothesis I never saw yet in any of our Nonconformists Books. I will yield him more. As,
Here Dr. Goodman proves us to be guilty of Judaism, telling his Reader, p. 69 this is their grand Hypothesis, That nothing is lawful in the service of God, but what is expresly prescribed in Scripture. Such an Hypothesis I never saw yet in any of our Nonconformists Books. I will yield him more. As,
1. Not only express Scripture, but necessary consequence from Scripture; but then it must be necessary consequence.
2. Where the Lord hath lest us only a General Rule, and hath not tied us up to Particulars; let but the Particulars carry in them the nature of the General Rule, as the species includes the essence of the Genus, and we will yield them too.
2. Where the Lord hath lest us only a General Rule, and hath not tyed us op to Particulars; let but the Particulars carry in them the nature of the General Rule, as the species includes the essence of the Genus, and we will yield them too.