A41330:117
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
3. For Government; some Episcopacy is lawful.
The Proposition must not be universal, for then we shall fetch in a Universal Bishop, which as yet our opponents do not like. Make it particular, for my part I yield it.
The Proposition must not be universal, for then we shall setch in a Universal Bishop, which as yet our opponents do not like. Make it particular, for my part I yield it.
I shall therefore now give the true state of the Questions, and then leave it to the judicious Reader to see, whether any one argument the Conformists use, conclude the Questions.
For the First about imposed Forms of Prayer, the question is this: