A41330:137
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
What then? I pray conclude the question. Besides, as if we denied Ministers to make use of Scripture-expressions, into which as I said our Faith is resolved. We commend such prayers. I have heard a Nonconformist pray, and that for a convenient space of time, his prayer was composed almost all of Scripture-expressions, but so aptly, that I could but wonder at the gift, and yet I perceived he did not tie himself to a Form.
What then? I pray conclude the question. Besides, as if we denied Ministers to make use of Scripture-expressions, into which as I said our Faith is resolved. We commend such prayers. I have heard a Nonconformist pray, and that for a convenient space of time, his prayer was composed almost all of Scripture-expressions, but so aptly, that I could but wonder at the gift, and yet I perceived he did not tye himself to a Form.
But were those under the Old Testament tied up to words and syllables imposed upon them by ordinary persons, and might not, or did not use their own gifts? prove that, else you are beside the question. Besides our question speaks of a Gospel-church, which that was not.
But were those under the Old Testament tyed up to words and syllables imposed upon them by ordinary persons, and might not, or did not use their own gifts? prove that, else you are beside the question. Besides our question speaks of a Gospel-church, which that was not.
But P. 2. p. 354, 392. the Fr. Deb tell us, Christ used the same words three times.