A41330:161
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But still two things must be proved:
1. That Christ gave them this for a Form; a perfect Form, as I hear it often expressed.
2ly. That Christ tied them up to these words and syllables, as you do to yours.
2ly. That Christ tyed them up to these words and syllables, as you do to yours.
For the first, That it was perfect for the end Christ gave it, I doubt not; that is, to give us a summary of Prayer, what we should pray for. I shall quote but two or three that you will say were no Nonconformists. Maldonate the Jesuit, on Mat. 6. Non his necessario verbis, sed hac aut simile sententiâ; quoting Austin and Bede for his judgment; but proves it best from Christ and his Apostles, that did not use those very words in their Prayers. Grotius on