A41330:206
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To conclude this: If soundness of Doctrine, purity of Worship, and a conversation in some measure becoming the Gospel, be any true notes of a Church of Christ, then there have been, and I know are such Churches where no Forms of Prayer are composed, much less imposed upon the Ministry; that it was but a bold assertion of him to say All Churches had them.
To conclude this: If foundness of Doctrine, purity of Worship, and a conversation in some measure becoming the Gospel, be any true notes of a Church of Christ, then there have been, and I know are such Churches where no Forms of Prayer are composed, much less imposed upon the Ministry; that it was but a bold assertion of him to say All Churches had them.
I find no more in Mr. Car, nor the Fr. Debate. I see Mr. Falkner hath summed up five Reasons, which have been used by others most of them.
I find no more in Mr. Carre, nor the Fr. Debat. I see Mr. Falkner hath summed up five Reasons, which have been used by others most of them.
His first, The security of the Worship of God. This we had before. His second, That needful comprehensive petitions for all common and ordinary, spiritual and outward wants, &c. with fit Thanksgivings, may not be omitted, &c.