A41330:247
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Fr. Debate. tells us, 1That some of the Nonconformists are for Liturgy, but they think it not convenient for men of their parts and gifts:
The Fr. Debat. tells us, 1That some of the Nonconformists are for Liturgy, but they think it not convenient for men of their parts and gifts:
- 1Part 1. pag. 124.
Truly, Sir, when our hearts are in any trim becoming the duty of prayer, we find it a very great hindrance to be tied up to the Forms of other men; we cannot open our hearts, nor spread before the Lord our desires in other mens conceptions; we cannot work with their tools. But when laziness, despondency, and unbelief prevail, it is as convenient as may be for men of our sinful tempers. I could tell you something of the experience of my own carnal heart as to this point; but I find you are a person that jeer at the experiences of Christians, and therefore let it alone.
Truly, Sir, when our hearts are in any trim becoming the duty of prayer, we find it a very great hindrance to be tyed up to the Forms of other men; we cannot open our hearts, nor spread before the Lord our desires in other mens conceptions; we cannot work with their tools. But when laziness, despondency, and unbelief prevail, it is as convenient as may be for men of our sinful tempers. I could tell you something of the experience of my own carnal heart as to this point; but I find you are a person that jeer at the experiences of Christians, and therefore let it alone.