A41330:283
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Porro determinantur aliquo modo in particulari: nempe ut fiant tali modo, qui circumstantiis omnibus consideratis, est maxime conveniens adificationi.
Si nullus sit error hominis in hac circumstantiarum determination constituenda, constitutio illa, habenda est quasi simpliciter divina. Thus Mr. Norton.
Si nullus sit error hominis in hac circumstantiarum determinatione constituenda, constitutio illa, habenda est quasi simpliciter divina. Thus Mr. Norton.
By this we may see the modesty of Dr. Goodman, that can tell his Reader so confidently, that this is our grand Hypothesis, and the Characteristical Doctrine of the Nonconformist party, That nothing is lawful in the service of God but what is expressly prescribed in Scripture. The contrary to which he might have read in this Author, and in others, I question not.
By this we may see the modesty of Dr. Goodman, that can tell his Reader so confidently, that this is our grand Hypothesis, and the Characteristical Doctrine of the Nonconformist party, That nothing is lawful in the service of God but what is expresly prescribed in Scripture. The contrary to which he might have read in this Author, and in others, I question not.