A41330:367
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2ly. It is all one to us to sit or kneel; one gesture is as easy as the other. Till Transubstantiation was hatching, kneeling was not commonly known in the Church, but for some time of the year it was forbidden; much less was it contended for: and such punishments inflicted upon them who refuse it, as amongst us. The Popish party blame us for kneeling, denying their Doctrine of Transubstantiation.
2ly. It is all one to us to sit or kneel; one gesture is as easie as the other. Till Transubstantiation was hatching, kneeling was not commonly known in the Church, but for some time of the year it was forbidden; much less was it contended for: and such punishments inflicted upon them who refuse it, as amongst us. The Popish party blame us for kneeling, denying their Doctrine of Transubstantiation.
3ly. That your Kneelers worship Christ in and by the Elements, the great contenders for kneeling have confessed, 1as the Author of the dispute against English Popish Ceremonies, have shown out of Dr. Burgess, Dr. Morton, and Paybody the Bishop of Edinburgh, Archbishop of St. Andrews, upon which he undertakes to prove that kneeling in the act of receiving the Lords Supper is Idolatrous.
3ly. That your Kneelers worship Christ in and by the Elements, the great contenders for kneeling have confessed, 1as the Author of the dispute against English Popish Ceremonies, have shewn out of Dr. Burgess, Dr. Morton, and Paybody the Bishop of Edenburgh, Archbishop of St. Andrews, upon which he undertakes to prove that kneeling in the act of receiving the Lords Supper is Idolatrous.
- 1Pag. 167.