A41330:373
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I shall shut up this with the judgment of the learned and pious Whitaker, as I see him quoted, by Maccovius upon this question.
I shall shut up this with the judgment of the learned and pious VVhitaker, as I see him quoted, by Maccovius upon this question.
Q. 1Whether when we receive the Lords Supper, should we kneel, stand or fit?
- 1Theol. loc. Q. 43.
A. Respondet Whitakerus, saith Maccovius, to kneel doth not only exclude the Rites of the Institution, but doth much violate the second Commandment concerning shunning Idolatry.
To stand about the Lords-Table, doth partake of the Rites, and detracts nothing from the Institution.