A41330:390
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
A Law is a positive thing, so are Governors particular Laws, then so must the general Law be. To say not contrary to the word, what Law is this? Non ens is no Law. How can these particular Laws be said to be according to the Law, and agreeable with the Law, when no such Law can be found? If the Law can be found, then that distinction is but vain.
A Law is a positive thing, so are Governours particular Laws, then so must the general Law be. To say not contrary to the word, what Law is this? Non ens is no Law. How can these particular Laws be said to be according to the Law, and agreeable with the Law, when no such Law can be found? If the Law can be found, then that distinction is but vain.
Though this Author hath said enough, yet because this distinction is so common in their mouths; I will but add a few Scriptures in which we shall find an injunction laid upon us, that in matters concerning God, our duty towards him, we look that all things be according to his word.
The first Text is, col. 2.8. Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit, according (though we read after, that makes no difference, [Greek or Hebrew] with an Accusative Case, secundum) to the Traditions of men; according to the rudiments of the world, and not according to Christ.
The first Text is, col. 2.8. Beware lest any man spoil you through Philosophy and vain deceit, according (though we read after, that makes no difference, 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 with an Accusative Case, secundum) to the Traditions of men; according to the rudiments of the world, and not according to Christ.