A41330:503
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2ly. But if the sauce Charoseth were made of Chicory, Lettuce, and other bitter herbs, as Scaliger saith, & aliis nescio quibus, and with him agree Capellus, then Christ kept to the Institution; for the Law was only general, for Bitternesses; but neither is this sauce yet proved at Christs Table.
2ly. But if the sawce Charoseth were made of Cichory, Lettice, and other bitter herbs, as Scaliger saith, & aliis nescio quibus, and with him agree Capellus, then Christ kept to the Institution; for the Law was only general, for Bitternesses; but neither is this sawce yet proved at Christs Table.
3ly. For washings, there were Civil, Religious, and superstitious washings; let Scaliger prove that Christ conformed to the Superstitious washings: They did bless God for the washing of hands, and then washed their hands. We know how conformable Christ was to them in washing of hands, but this is washing of feet: More prorsus insolito, ⟨p. 56⟩saith Gerhard Great debate there is among Divines when this washing was, whether before, after, or in Supper time. Drusius finds such a knot here, that he that can untie it, shall be to him Magnus in Oculis.
3ly. For washings, there were Civil, Religious, and superstitious washings; let Scaliger prove that Christ conformed to the Superstitious washings: They did bless God for the washing of hands, and then washed their hands. We know how conformable Christ was to them in washing of hands, but this is washing of feet: More prorsus insolito, ⟨p. 56⟩saith Gerhard Great debate there is among Divines when this washing was, whether before, after, or in Supper time. Drusius finds such a knot here, that he that can untye it, shall be to him Magnus in Oculis.