A41330:663
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6ly. If Apostolical practise be not sufficient, then you may to Rome for a Form, for ought I know, I know no stop.
As to the Author of the Book Samaritanism, I am sure the Author was nothing a-kin to the good Samaritan; for he shows himself a man of a vinegar-spirit, his discourse as to Church-Government, is built upon this foundation, That Form of Government which appeared for hundreds of years, first, only, and was de facto Instituted of God, that only hath Divine right to warrant it, p. 10, 11. In p. 37. I find this was Episcopacy, but this is very false; these three terms, first, only, and hundreds of years, are not found in Episcopacy. The first Governors had power over Bishops and Archbishops, if any such Creatures were.
As to the Author of the Book Samaritanism, I am sure the Author was nothing a-kin to the good Samaritan; for he shews himself a man of a vinegar-spirit, his discourse as to Church-Government, is built upon this foundation, That Form of Government which appeared for hundreds of years, first, only, and was de facto Instituted of God, that only hath Divine right to warrant it, p. 10, 11. In p. 37. I find this was Episcopacy, but this is very false; these three terms, first, only, and hundreds of years, are not found in Episcopacy. The first Governours had power over Bishops and Archbishops, if any such Creatures were.
2ly. They were not the only Governors, for the Presbyters governed while the Apostles lived.
2ly. They were not the only Governours, for the Presbyters governed while the Apostles lived.