A41330:689
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2ly. It must be voluntary separation: So that Excommunicate persons are no Schismatics.
2ly. It must be voluntary separation: So that Excommunicate persons are no Schismaticks.
3ly. It is separation from a particular Church.
4ly. Of which Church he was once a member, because Schism imports division, making two of that which was but one before.
But according to this opening of his definition, I pray Sir, tell us how you will prove us Schismatics?
But according to this opening of his definition, I pray Sir, tell us how you will prove us Schismaticks?