A41330:77
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As to the third Quest. something I found in a piece Entitled Samaritanism. As to the Learned Dr. Stilling fleet, by throwing down the Jus Divinum of any form of Church Government, he prepared the way for our subjection to such Episcopacy, if his principle be sound.
As to the third Quest. something I found in a piece Entituled Samaritanism. As to the Learned Dr. Stilling fleet, by throwing down the Jus Divinum of any form of Church Government, he prepared the way for our subjection to such Episcopacy, if his principle be sound.
For the serious and compassionate Enquiry, I found little in that piece as to our questions, unless a man were so simple to take fine words for strong arguments, and Rhetoric for Logic. For his Discourse about schism, I shall consider it in its place. But the chief things I observed in him, were his odious comparisons between the Conformist and Nonconformist, begun at p. 21. and continued some pages His slighting that worthy Father blessed Austin; the contempt he throws upon the Synod of Dort, which I did never expect from the pen of a Son of the Church of England. But I see this Church of England, and the ⟨p. 3⟩famous Church of England, are not the same. I need not say any thing, there is an acute pen hath given him so full and solid an answer, that I ver expect to read his Reply.
For the serious and compassionate Enquiry, I found little in that piece as to our questions, unless a man were so simple to take fine words for strong arguments, and Rhetorick for Logick. For his Discourse about schism, I shall consider it in its place. But the chief things I observed in him, were his odious comparisons between the Conformist and Nonconformist, begun at p. 21. and continued some pages His slighting that worthy Father blessed Austin; the contempt he throws upon the Synod of Dort, which I did never expect from the pen of a Son of the Church of England. But I see this Church of England, and the ⟨p. 3⟩