A41330:788
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner,…
The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entitled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templars sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.The questions between the conformist and nonconformist, truly stated, and briefly discussed Dr. Falkner, The friendly debate &c., examined and answered : together with a discourse about separation, and some animadversions upon Dr. Stillingfleet's book entituled, The unreasonableness of separation : observations upon Dr. Templers sermon preached at a visitation in Cambridge : a brief vindication of Mr. Stephen Marshal.
London: printed for Tho. Cockerill, 1681
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2ly. There are other means to repair, without such Prelacy, as experience hath proved in several Churches, where Heresy and Schism have either been kept out, or healed when crept in; Profaneness suppressed better than ever it was in England by Prelacy.
2ly. There are other means to repair, without such Prelacy, as experience hath proved in several Churches, where Heresie and Schism have either been kept out, or healed when crept in; Profaneness suppressed better than ever it was in England by Prelacy.
3ly. That one Prelate is as subject to corruption in Doctrine, and conversation, as other Ministers; and who shall repair him? the Presbyters being inferior to him, they must not be so saucy; that kind of Creature whom you call the Metropolitan, is as subject to corruption, as the other Prelate.
3ly. That one Prelate is as subject to corruption in Doctrine, and conversation, as other Ministers; and who shall repair him? the Presbyters being inferior to him, they must not be so sawcy; that kind of Creature whom you call the Metropolitan, is as subject to corruption, as the other Prelate.
As to the proof you give, p. 26, 27. There is a greater probability of an union of judgments, when all within a certain precinct lye under an obligation to be determined by the reason of one, &c.