A41334:187
A sober reply to the sober answer of Reverend Mr. Cawdrey, to A serious…
A sober reply to the sober answer of Reverend Mr. Cawdrey, to A serious question propounded viz. whether the ministers of England are bound by the word of God to baptise the children of all such parents, which say they believe in Jesus Christ, but are grossly ignorant, scandalous in their conversations, scoffers at godliness, and refuse to submit to church discipline ... : also, the question of Reverend Mr. Hooker concerning the baptism of infants : with a post-script to Reverend Mr. Blake / by G.I. Firmin ...A sober reply to the sober answer of Reverend Mr. Cawdrey, to A serious question propounded viz. whether the ministers of England are bound by the word of God to baptise the children of all such parents, which say they believe in Jesus Christ, but are grosly ignorant, scandalous in their conversations, scoffers at godliness, and refuse to submit to church dicipline ... : also, the question of Reverend Mr. Hooker concerning the baptisme of infants : with a post-script to Reverend Mr. Blake / by G.I. Firmin ...
London: printed by J.G., 1653
A SOBER REPLY TO A SOBER ANSWER, &c.A SOBER REPLY TO A SOBER ANSVVER, &c.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But here you will charge Master Hooker with a Contradiction: because he seems to be against this practise, that Members of one Congregation should partake of the Sacraments in another Congregation.
But here you will charge Master Hooker with a Contradiction: because hee seemes to bee against this practise, that Members of one Congregation should partake of the Sacraments in another Congregation.
Had Mr. Hooker lived to have filed over his work again, I do believe he would have considered this place again; but the other places are most plain. Yet something may be said for him.
Had Mr. Hooker lived to have filed over his work againe, I do believe he would have considered this place again; but the other places are most plain. Yet something may be said for him.
That Master Hooker should be against the giving of the Sacrament to a Member of another Congregation, who hath occasion to be absent from his ow•e, and is commended and approved by his own Church, this I cannot believe.