A41335:100
Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the…
Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the work of the ministry be necessary?, II. Whether it be essential to the right constitution of a particular church, that the teaching elders and the members meet always in one place? : whereunto is added a prediction of Mr. Daniel Rogers, minister in Essex, long before the beheading King Charles I and Arch-Bishop Laud, foretelling that they should not dye a natural death / by Giles Firmin ...Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the work of the ministry be necessry?, II. Whether it be essential to the right constitution of a particular church, that the teaching elders and the members meet alwayes in one place? : whereunto is added a prediction of Mr. Daniel Rogers, minister in Essex, long before the beheading King Charles I and Arch-Bishop Laud, foretelling that they should not dye a natural death / by Giles Firmin ...
London : Printed for the author, 1692
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I have done with this; I only aimed at this; Teaching Elders may Ordain, and we have Divine Authority for it in the Texts before mentioned: These we are sure are Officers in the Church by Christs Institution; The Lutherans have Bishops, yet they deny any inequality jure Divino, between Bishops and Presbyters, quoad Potestatem Jurisdictionis. Therefore Gerrard answering Bellarmin appropriating Ordination to Bishops saith, 1there is not one tittle in all God's Book, that Ordination by Bishops should be valid, but by Presbyters should be Null.
- 1De Minist. Eccles. p. 261.
The next thing is, it must be performed with Imposition of Hands: I named five Scriptures for this before.
What Dr. Owen saith, Ordination of Ministers is one thing, Imposition of hands is another, differing as the whole and the part. I yield it by this whole, he must mean totum integral, it cannot be totum universal, but we say in Logic, suolata qualibet part tollitur perfectio Integri, sed sublata parte principally tollitur integrum. Then I say where there is not Imposition of hands, there is no Ordination, for this Imposition is the principal part, and so tollitur Integrum.
What Dr. Owen saith, Ordination of Ministers is one thing, Imposition of hands is another, differing as the whole and the part. I yield it by this whole, he must mean totum integrale, it cannot be totum universale, but we say in Logick, suolata qualibet parte tollitur perfectio Integri, sed sublata parte principali tollitur integrum. Then I say where there is not Imposition of hands, there is no Ordination, for this Imposition is the principal part, and so tollitur Integrum.