A41335:123
Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the…
Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the work of the ministry be necessary?, II. Whether it be essential to the right constitution of a particular church, that the teaching elders and the members meet always in one place? : whereunto is added a prediction of Mr. Daniel Rogers, minister in Essex, long before the beheading King Charles I and Arch-Bishop Laud, foretelling that they should not dye a natural death / by Giles Firmin ...Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the work of the ministry be necessry?, II. Whether it be essential to the right constitution of a particular church, that the teaching elders and the members meet alwayes in one place? : whereunto is added a prediction of Mr. Daniel Rogers, minister in Essex, long before the beheading King Charles I and Arch-Bishop Laud, foretelling that they should not dye a natural death / by Giles Firmin ...
London : Printed for the author, 1692
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Upon the same grounds, it cannot be meant of Confirmation. For the Gift was Extraordinary, Temporary, Proper to the Apostles; Ananias had an ⟨p. 10⟩immediate Call to it, Acts 9.10, 11.17. Philip had no such power, or Gift in Acts 8. And after the Apostles we read of none that could, or did confer Gifts extraordinary by Imposition of Hands. What he means by occasional, I know not. I know no word of Healing unless People were sick.
2dly. But I read in the Dr. p. 34. thus, we shall allow room also for that other exposition of the Words which is more generally received, (I suppose he means Ordination) because it complies with the Analogy of Faith: I dare not be peremptory. Then the Dr. is not absolutely against me.
So much for my first Argument.