A41335:209
Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the…
Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the work of the ministry be necessary?, II. Whether it be essential to the right constitution of a particular church, that the teaching elders and the members meet always in one place? : whereunto is added a prediction of Mr. Daniel Rogers, minister in Essex, long before the beheading King Charles I and Arch-Bishop Laud, foretelling that they should not dye a natural death / by Giles Firmin ...Weighty questions discussed I. Whether imposition of hands in separating a person to the work of the ministry be necessry?, II. Whether it be essential to the right constitution of a particular church, that the teaching elders and the members meet alwayes in one place? : whereunto is added a prediction of Mr. Daniel Rogers, minister in Essex, long before the beheading King Charles I and Arch-Bishop Laud, foretelling that they should not dye a natural death / by Giles Firmin ...
London : Printed for the author, 1692
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
5. The Scriptures which are for Ordination by Imposition of Hands are more in number, and far more clear than those for Election; the first Text which they bring for Election, Acts 1.15. this differs much from curs, for our Election is with Subjection to him whom the People Elect: But this was not so. Did Peter [the Pope will be angry if you tell him so] and the other Apostles subject themselves to him whom they Chose? 2ly. It was choosing one of their own Order, not one above them, so does not Popular Election. 3ly. Tho' Peter did speak to all present, yet it does not appear that all present did choose, but the Apostles, for they could tell best, who had accompanied them all the time the Lord Jesus went in and out among them, V. 21, 22. Surely all that were present could not tell who those were as the Apostles. 4ly. They gave forth their Lots, V. 26. 5ly: They Prayed to the Lord, to show whether of these two Thou hast chosen, 24. Is this Text clear for Popular Election?
5. The Scriptures which are for Ordination by Imposition of Hands are more in number, and far more clear than those for Election; the first Text which they bring for Election, Acts 1.15. this differs much from curs, for our Election is with Subjection to him whom the People Elect: But this was not so. Did Peter [the Pope will be angry if you tell him so] and the other Apostles sabject themselves to him whom they Chose? 2ly. It was choosing one of their own Order, not one above them, so does not Popular Election. 3ly. Tho' Peter did speak to all present, yet it does not appear that all present did choose, but the Apostles, for they could tell best, who had accompanied them all the time the Lord Jesus went in and out among them, V. 21, 22. Surely all that were present could not tell who those were as the Apostles. 4ly. They gave forth their Lotts, V. 26. 5ly: They Prayed to the Lord, to shew whether of these two Thou hast chosen, 24. Is this Text clear for Popular Election?