A41521:164
A discourse of the true nature of the Gospel demonstrating that it is no…
A discourse of the true nature of the Gospel demonstrating that it is no new law, but a pure doctrine of grace : in answer to the Reverend Mr. Lorimer's Apology / by Tho. Goodwin ...
London: printed by J. Darby, 1695
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
The Popish Commentators indeed universally interpret this Rom. 3. 27. to design the Gospel to be a new Gracious Law. Thusa Aquinas, and the Cardinalb Cajetan; cArias Montanus; dAmbrosius Catharinus, Bishop of Minori; eCornelius Mussus, Bishop of Bitonto; the four Jesuits, fBenedictus Justinianus, gCornelius a Lapide, hEstius, andi Adamus ⟨p. 61⟩Contzen. This last orders his Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, in a way of Disputation, to refute the Heretics, as he calls all those who believe the pure Truths of the Gospel. One great Doctrine of these No-Heretics is, that the Gospel is no Law. This supposed Error the Jesuit applies himself to confute; and in resolving that Question, What is the Law of Works? and what the Law of Faith? he first propounds Bellarmine's Decision of it; the Sum whereof is, that the Gospel is a Law of Works too, but accompanied with Grace. But there is an Objection of Paraeus in the way, That if the Gospel be a Law, as containing in it Precepts and Commands, then the Distinction which the Apostle makes between the Law of Faith, and Law of Works, cannot be preserved; for both of them will agree in commanding Works, however different those Works may be which they enjoin, and therefore they both of them must necessarily be Laws of Works; unless any one will be so accurate a Disputant, as to deny a Law to be a Law, or Works to be Works. To remove this Objection, Contzen, (who being a Jesuit, was very well skilled in all the Arts of Shuffling as well as any Man, and knew the necessary Doubles and Turnings when he was hunted) like a Politician in Divinity, makes this evasive Answer; That both Laws command, and yet the Law of Faith is not a Law of Works, though it commands Works; because it hath the Aids of Grace, by which the Works are performed. Therefore the Law of Faith is a Law of Grace, the Law of Works is without Grace. This is strange indeed; What! the Gospel commands, and yet is not a Law of Works; that is, the Gospel commands, without bidding us to do any thing; or to do, is not to work, but I know not what without a Name. Ay, but it is not a Law of Works, because it contains in it Grace, as a supply of Succour to enable us to perform them. But this only proves the Works of their new Gospel to be easier, not that they are none at all.