A41521:66
A discourse of the true nature of the Gospel demonstrating that it is no…
A discourse of the true nature of the Gospel demonstrating that it is no new law, but a pure doctrine of grace : in answer to the Reverend Mr. Lorimer's Apology / by Tho. Goodwin ...
London: printed by J. Darby, 1695
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To evince that among the Fathers, the word [Greek or Hebrew] Nomos, Law, did not always signify a System of Precepts and Commands, I may also introduce Origen, who, as a competent Judg in the Case, declares that* he very well knew the Psalms to be called a Law, as also the Prophecy of Esa: And to prove it, he brings in those Texts of Scripture, John 15. 25. Psal. 35. 19. 1 Cor. 14. 21. And his Authority is to be the more regarded, as to the Decision of the Question in present Debate, because, as he complains (in the beginning of this his 9th Chapter cited by me) of the Confusion which the ambiguousness of the Word Law did breed in Mens Minds, (which is the Case now too) so he employs this whole Chapter to clear its various Significations.
To evince that among the Fathers, the word 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 Nomos, Law, did not always signify a System of Precepts and Commands, I may also introduce Origen, who, as a competent Judg in the Case, declares that* he very well knew the Psalms to be called a Law, as also the Prophecy of Esa: And to prove it, he brings in those Texts of Scripture, John 15. 25. Psal. 35. 19. 1 Cor. 14. 21. And his Authority is to be the more regarded, as to the Decision of the Question in present Debate, because, as he complains (in the beginning of this his 9th Chapter cited by me) of the Confusion which the ambiguousness of the Word Law did breed in Mens Minds, (which is the Case now too) so he employs this whole Chapter to clear its various Significations.
- *[Greek or Hebrew], &c.—[Greek or Hebrew], &c. Origen. Philocal. cap. 19. pag. 35. Edit. Spenceri, Cant. 1677.