A41670:13595
A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein…
A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein every word and particle in the original is explained ... : being the substance of thirty years Wednesdays lectures at Black-fryers, London / by that holy and learned divine William Gouge ... : before which is prefixed a narrative of his life and death : whereunto is added two alphabetical tables ...A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein every word and particle in the original is explained ... : being the substance of thirty years Wednesdayes lectures at Black-fryers, London / by that holy and learned divine Wiliam Gouge ... : before which is prefixed a narrative of his life and death : whereunto is added two alphabeticall tables ...
London: printed by A.M. for Joshua Kirton, 1655
Chapter 10 › Section 12: §. 12. Of reconciling, Heb. 10. 5, 6, 7. with Psalm. 40. 6, 7, 8.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Some make a further difference, in that the Psalmist speaketh of the manner of offering sacrifices, namely that God rejecteth them, because they were offered hypocritically, deceitfully, with a corrupt heart; and that the Apostle speaketh of the very matter and substance of legal sacrifices in the best use that can be.
Answ.
1. The Psalmist may speak of the very matter and substance of those sacrifices, as well as the Apostle. There is no ground to restrain the Psalmists words to the manner of offering. Indeed in some places God rejecteth sacrifices by reason of an evil manner of offering them, as Isa. 1. 11, &c. But no circumstance in this Psalm intimateth any such thing. 2. If it were granted that the Psalmist speaketh of the manner of offering, it would not follow that thereupon he should not intend an abrogation of the sacrifices themselves ⟨p. 433⟩for both may stand together. God may reject them in regard of the impo•y of them in themselves: and also in regard of peoples evil manner of offering […]
1. The Psalmist may speak of the very matter and substance of those sacrifices, as well as the Apostle. There is no ground to restrain the Psalmists words to the manner of offering. Indeed in some places God rejecteth sacrifices by reason of an evill manner of offering them, as Isa. 1. 11, &c. But no circumstance in this Psalme intimateth any such thing. 2. If it were granted that the Psalmist speaketh of the manner of offering, it would not follow that thereupon he should not intend an abrogation of the sacrifices themselves