A41670:1367
A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein…
A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein every word and particle in the original is explained ... : being the substance of thirty years Wednesdays lectures at Black-fryers, London / by that holy and learned divine William Gouge ... : before which is prefixed a narrative of his life and death : whereunto is added two alphabetical tables ...A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein every word and particle in the original is explained ... : being the substance of thirty years Wednesdayes lectures at Black-fryers, London / by that holy and learned divine Wiliam Gouge ... : before which is prefixed a narrative of his life and death : whereunto is added two alphabeticall tables ...
London: printed by A.M. for Joshua Kirton, 1655
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 141. Of Christs Immutability.
The Immutability of creatures being distinctly set out, the Apostle returneth to the main point intended, which is Christs immutability. It was before generally set down in this phrase, Thou remainest, §. 136. 138. Here it is illustrated in these two other branches, Thou art the same, Thy years shall not fail.
THe Immutability of creatures being distinctly set out, the Apostle returneth to the main point intended, which is Christs immutability. It was before generally set down in this phrase, Thou remainest, §. 136. 138. Here it is illustrated in these two other branches, Thou art the same, Thy years shall not fail.
Though all these three phrases in general intend one and the same thing, namely immutability, yet to show that there is no tautology, no vain repetition of one and the same thing therein, they may be distinguished one from another.
Though all these three phrases in generall intend one and the same thing, namely immutability, yet to shew that there is no tautology, no vain repetition of one and the same thing therein, they may be distinguished one from another.