A41670:13678
A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein…
A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein every word and particle in the original is explained ... : being the substance of thirty years Wednesdays lectures at Black-fryers, London / by that holy and learned divine William Gouge ... : before which is prefixed a narrative of his life and death : whereunto is added two alphabetical tables ...A learned and very useful commentary on the whole epistle to the Hebrews wherein every word and particle in the original is explained ... : being the substance of thirty years Wednesdayes lectures at Black-fryers, London / by that holy and learned divine Wiliam Gouge ... : before which is prefixed a narrative of his life and death : whereunto is added two alphabeticall tables ...
London: printed by A.M. for Joshua Kirton, 1655
Chapter 10 › Section 22: §. 22. Of the meaning of Heb. 10. 8.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
This phrase, when he said, (or word for word bsaying) hath reference to Christ; for it is he that uttered the words following.
- b[Greek or Hebrew].〈non-Latin alphabet〉.
Of the four distinct kinds of oblations here set down, 1. Sacrifice. 2. Offering. 3. Burnt-Offerings. 4. Offerings for sin, see §. 16. Under these, all the external means, which under the Law were used to free men from sin, are comprised. Concerning all which, it is said in reference to God, thou wouldst not, neither hadst pleasure therein. This showeth, that God regarded them not, but rather rejected them. Of the meaning of these two phrases, and the difference betwixt them, see §. 16.
Of the four distinct kinds of oblations here set down, 1. Sacrifice. 2. Offering. 3. Burnt-Offerings. 4. Offerings for sin, see §. 16. Under these, all the external means, which under the Law were used to free men from sin, are comprized. Concerning all which, it is said in reference to God, thou wouldst not, neither hadst pleasure therein. This sheweth, that God regarded them not, but rather rejected them. Of the meaning of these two phrases, and the difference betwixt them, see §. 16.
This phrase, which are offered by the Law, or according to the Law, is here added1 by the Apostle; for it is neither in the Psalm, nor in the former verses, wherein the foresaid testimony is quoted. It is pertinently inserted, to meet with an objection, which may be this, The forementioned sacrifices were offered by the Law, or by Gods own appointment: how then can it be imagined, that God should reject them?