A42456:38
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth…
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresy and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a false attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the business between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that business / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things showed to be an untrue relation.An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresie and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a fase attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the busines between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that busines / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things shewed to be an untrue relation.
London: printed by E.G. for F. Clifton, 1642
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. How far forth M. Walker hath Gods Word for his warrant, in condemning M. Wotton, not of error (for that neither was, nor is the question) but of heresy and blasphemy (for that was the point in controversy, when time was) he hath not yet made to appear, no more then he did. For what here fondly and ridiculously in that kind he presumeth, by the sentence of his own delegates, he was not then able to make good.
4. How farre forth M. Walker hath Gods Word for his warrant, in condemning M. Wotton, not of errour (for that neither was, nor is the question) but of heresie and blasphemy (for that was the point in controversie, when time was) he hath not yet made to appeare, no more then he did. For what here fondly and ridiculously in that kind he presumeth, by the sentence of his owne delegates, he was not then able to make good.
The other doubt he moveth concerning the cause of my proclaiming so bitterly against him, and being so highly offended with him, is, c