An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth…

Had M. Walker either dealt more fairly at first, with his Christian brother and fellow-Minister of Christ, M. A. Wotton; or upon second thoughts (^a which are wont to be the wiser) better considered of what before he had unadvisedly attempted; he had therein peradventure in part at least, either saved or salved his own credit: sure I am, he had eased me of some labour, that I had little lust unto. He traduced M. Wotton in the Pulpit as a vile heretic, while he lived, what time he knew Master Wottons tongue, through the iniquity of the times, to be so ^btied up, that he could not in public plead his own cause. Long after his decease he reneweth his revilings of him, and brandeth him again for the like in print; when being hence translated, he cannot now either in public or in private personally appear for himself. A true relation of the carriage of the main matter in controversy between them, in a meeting of M. Walkers own procuring, wherein M. Wotton was acquitted, being hereupon published; he proceedeth, after his wonted guise, in violent and virulent manner, not only to charge him, as before, with heresy and blasphemy in the doctrine of justification, but (yet further to express his extreme malice and rancour against him) ^cwith the denial of the eternal Deity of Christ; how ⟨p. 2⟩soundly, yea or seemingly, for any show or shadow of reason, let any intelligent Reader judge. And over and besides that, (hoping thereby to help himself, where he sticketh fast in the mire) he sticketh not to ^dcast foul aspersions upon all those that had any hand in that hearing, not sparing them therein whom himself had made choice of.