A42456:81
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth…
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresy and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a false attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the business between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that business / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things showed to be an untrue relation.An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresie and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a fase attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the busines between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that busines / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things shewed to be an untrue relation.
London: printed by E.G. for F. Clifton, 1642
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
6. It is not true, that cI derided him, when he gave in his charge of Socinian heresy & blasphemy against M. Wotton. For I never so did. Tho I confess, I could not forbear smiling at the reading of dthe second point in his Parallel condemned as a blasphemous Socinian heresy. And I suppose that scarce any sound and judicious Divine will be able to read it sine risu aut stomacho.
6. It is not true, that cI derided him, when he gave in his charge of Socinian heresie & blasphemy against M. Wotton. For I never so did. Tho I confesse, I could not forbeare smiling at the reading of dthe second point in his Parallel condemned as a blasphemous Socinian heresie. And I suppose that scarce any sound and judicious Divine will be able to read it sine risu aut stomacho.
- cPag. […].Pag. 〈…〉.
- dRelat p. 13.
7. Nor is it true, that eDr. Baily came in amongst us, as by M. Walker designed to succeed in the room of D. Westfield. For D. Westfield was expected that very day, that D. Baylie intruded himself into our company, tho very likely indeed; not without M. Walker• privity and procurement, to disturb our proceedings. Yet not pretending to appear in D. Westfield's room, however afterward he supplied it, to make up the number; but making bold forsooth to associate himself with us,