A42456:82
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth…
An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresy and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a false attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the business between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that business / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things showed to be an untrue relation.An answer to Mr. George Walkers vindication, or rather, fresh accusation wherein he chargeth Mr. Wotton, besides his former foul aspersions of heresie and blasphemy, with Arianism, Mr. Gataker with Socinianism, Dr. Gouge and Mr. Downham with a fase attestation, Dr. Baylie and Mr. Stock with self-condemnation, all the eight ministers employed in the busines between himself and Mr. Wotton with partiality and unjust judgement : upon occasion of a relation concerning that busines / written by the said Thomas Gataker and by him now again avowed, wherein the said M. Walkers vindication is in many things shewed to be an untrue relation.
London: printed by E.G. for F. Clifton, 1642
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
7. Nor is it true, that eDr. Baily came in amongst us, as by M. Walker designed to succeed in the room of D. Westfield. For D. Westfield was expected that very day, that D. Baylie intruded himself into our company, tho very likely indeed; not without M. Walker• privity and procurement, to disturb our proceedings. Yet not pretending to appear in D. Westfield's room, however afterward he supplied it, to make up the number; but making bold forsooth to associate himself with us, fbecause we met in his Church. The most of the rest misliking, and muttering at it among themselves, as desirous rather of his room then his company. And that, as for some other reasons not so fit to be here related; so the rather for that no sooner almost he was set down among us, but he began to quarrel with M. Wotton about his ap peril, because he went not in a Ministerial habit.
7. Nor is it true, that eDr. Baily came in amongst us, as by M. Walker designed to succeed in the roome of D. Westfield. For D. Westfield was expected that very day, that D. Baylie intruded himselfe into our company, tho very likely indeed; not without M. Walker• privity and procurement, to disturb our proceedings. Yet not pretending to appeare in D. Westfields roome, however afterward he supplied it, to make up the number; but making bold forsooth to associate himselfe with us, fbecause we met in his Church. The most of the rest misliking, and muttering at it among themselves, as desirous rather of his roome then his company. And that, as for some other reasons not so fit to be here related; so the rather for that no sooner almost he was set down among us, but he began to quarrel with M. Wotton about his ap parrell, because he went not in a Ministeriall habit.
- eVindic. p. 19.
- f