The blessedness of the righteous discoursed from Psal. 17, 15 /The blessednesse of the righteous discoursed from Psal. 17, 15 /

Which Text I take for a plain Comment upon this; and me-thinks it should not easily be supposable they should both speak so near the same words and not intend the same sense: you have in both the same season When he shall appear, when I shall awake, the same subject the righteous person born of God, (compare the close of the former Chapter with the beginning of this) and I in righteousness, The same Vision, We shall see him as he is, I shall behold his face, The same Assimilation, We shall be like him, I shall be satisfied with his likeness; (concerning the [Greek or Hebrew] or habitude this vision and assimilation mutually have to one another, there will be consideration had in its place.)

Which Text I take for a plain Comment upon this; and me-thinks it should not easily be supposeable they should both speak so near the same words and not intend the same sense: you have in both the same season When he shall appear, when I shall awake, the same subject the righteous person born of God, (compare the close of the former Chapter with the beginning of this) and I in righteousness, The same Vision, We shall see him as he is, I shall behold his face, The same Assimilation, We shall be like him, I shall be satisfied with his likeness; (concerning the 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 or habitude this vision and assimilation mutually have to one another, there will be consideration had in its place.)

I therefore conceive neither of these Notions of the Divine likeness, do exclude the other; if it be enquired which is principally meant, That needs not be determined; if the latter, it supposes the former; if the former, it infers the latter. Without the first, the ⟨p. 13⟩other cannot be, without this other, the first cannot satisfy.

I therefore conceive neither of these Notions of the Divine likeness, do exclude the other; if it be enquired which is principally meant, That needs not be determined; if the latter, it supposes the former; if the former, it infers the latter. Without the first, the