A44701:55
A view of that part of the late considerations adderest to H.H. about the…A view of that part of the late considerations addrest to H.H. about the…
A view of that part of the late considerations adderest to H.H. about the Trinity which concerns the sober enquiry, on that subject : in a letter to the former friend.A view of that part of the late considerations addrest to H.H. about the Trinity which concerns the sober enquiry, on that subject : in a letter to the former friend.
London: printed for Tho. Parkhurst, 1695
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
In the mean time, it is observable how needlessly he slurs himself in this his first brisk Onset. He says, No Man ever pretended—That the vegetative, sensitive, and intellective Faculties (or Powers) are so many distinct, individual Persons, Substances, or Essences, we grant, &c.
In the mean time, it is observable how needlesly he slurs himself in this his first brisk Onset. He says, No Man ever pretended—That the vegetative, sensitive, and intellective Faculties (or Powers) are so many distinct, individual Persons, Substances, or Essences, we grant, &c.
What did no Man ever pretend that these three distinct Natures, the vegetative, sensitive, intellective, were, in Man, three ⟨p. 29⟩distinct Substances, or Souls, concurring by a certain subordination in him? What necessity was there, that to heighten his Triumph, in the Opinion of his credulous Followers, he should, with so glorious a Confidence, put on the vain and false show of having all the World on his side; and herein either dissemble his Knowledge, or grossly bewray his Ignorance in the mere History of Philosophy. And most imprudently suppose all his Readers as ignorant, as he would seem! What, did he never hear of an Averroist in the World? Doth he not know that Physician and Philosopher, and his Followers, earnestly contended for what he says no Man ever pretended to? Or that divers other Commentators upon Aristotle, have some abetted, others as vehemently opposed them in it? Not to insist also that some thought the Intellectus Agens, and Patiens to be distinct Substances, belonging to the Nature of Man, as others had also other Conceits about the former? And if he look some hundreds of ⟨p. 30⟩Years back, as far as the time, and extant Work of Nemesius, Bishop and Philosopher (as he writes himself) of the Nature of Man, (who lived in the Time of Gregory Nazianzen, as appears by an Epistle of his writ to him, and prefixed to that little Book of his) he will find that Author takes notice there were divers that took Man to consist of Mind, Soul, and Body, and that some did doubt whether the Mind super vening to the Soul,