A view of that part of the late considerations adderest to H.H. about the…A view of that part of the late considerations addrest to H.H. about the…

In the forecited Questions, he expressly says we were to acknowledge in the Deity [Greek or Hebrew], three Individuals. Answer to Quest. 7. ubi priùs.

In the forecited Questions, he expresly says we were to acknowledg in the Deity 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, three Individuals. Answer to Quest. 7. ubi priùs.

And elsewhere he as distinctly asserts [Greek or Hebrew], three things. And what could he mean by three things, not three Deities, (as he often inculcates) but he must certainly mean three Entities, three Essences; for by three things, he could not possibly mean three Non-Entities, or three Nothings. His great care plainly was to assert the true Deity of the Son and Spirit, or their Preeternity, or that it could never be said ([Greek or Hebrew]) there was a time when they were not, which he inculcates in an hundred places, still insisting that one Deity, one Essence was common to them, but still with distinction; and as warmly inveighs against Sabellius and P. Samosatensis, as against Arius every whit.

And elsewhere he as distinctly asserts 〈non-Latin alphabet〉, three things. And what could he mean by three things, not three Deities, (as he often inculcates) but he must certainly mean three Entities, three Essences; for by three things, he could not possibly mean three Non-Entities, or three Nothings. His great care plainly was to assert the true Deity of the Son and Spirit, or their Preeternity, or that it could never be said (〈non-Latin alphabet〉) there was a time when they were not, which he inculcates in an hundred places, still insisting that one Deity, one Essence was common to them, but still with distinction; and as warmly inveighs against Sabellius and P. Samosatensis, as against Arius every whit.