A44973:356
An humble apology for non-conformists with modest and serious reflections on the Friendly debate…
An humble apology for non-conformists with modest and serious reflections on the Friendly debate and the continuation thereof / by a lover of truth and peace.
S.l. : s.n., 1669
Postscript: A Postscript to the Author of the Friendly Debate.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Q. 6. Whether what was said, done, or Printed in times of War, ought to be remembered and produced in Evidence in times of Peace, after a most solemn Act of Oblivion and Indemnity?
Q. 6. Whether what was said, done, or Printed in times of War, ought to be remembered and produced in Evidence in times of Peace, after a most solemn Act of Oblivion and Indempnity?
Q. 7. Whether it was seasonable, when His most Excellent Majesty, and the Parliament, at the last Session, had under Consideration some Expedient for Union and Reconciliation, for a Minister of the Gospel of Peace & of a professed large Charity to Print and publish such Books as might rationally be thought might prove to be Obstructions in the way of Accommodation?
Q. 8. Whether there be not as much evidence of Charity, Modesty, Meekness and Moderation in Mr. Corbet his Two Pieces, as in the Three Parts of the Friendly Debate?
Q. 9. Why you are pleased to charge the Nonconformists with so much rigour & severity against Dissenters formerly, without remembering that the Archbishop of Armagh, and Bishop Brownrig were Public Preachers in the Inns of Court in those times; or that the present Bishop of Worcester, then Bishop of Oxford, enjoyed a good Parsonage; and that the greatest part of the now Conformists in England, had public Employment in those times?