A44973:361
An humble apology for non-conformists with modest and serious reflections on the Friendly debate…
An humble apology for non-conformists with modest and serious reflections on the Friendly debate and the continuation thereof / by a lover of truth and peace.
S.l. : s.n., 1669
Postscript: A Postscript to the Author of the Friendly Debate.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Q. 11. Whether Dr. Heylins History of Presbytery doth not wound the Reformation through the sides of the Presbyterians?
Q. 12. Whether if the Nonconformists Confessions in their Prayers, may be produced in Evidence against them, How the Sons and Daughters of the Church will appear Innocent, who are ⟨p. 152⟩taught after every Commandment read by the Mister, to say and pray, Lord have mercy upon us, and incline our hearts to keep this Law?
Q. 13. Whether if His Majesty and the Parliament, would be graciously pleased to leave the use of the Three Ceremonies of our Church as indifferent, as the Canons in 1640 do the Ceremony of Bowing towards the East, or Altar; That Rule of Charity might not be still observed, namely, That those which use these Ceremonies should not despise them that use them not; and that those who use them not, condemn not those that use them?
Q. 14. Who hath thriven most and prospered best, the Spaniard with his Inquisition, or the Hollander with his Toleration?