A47448:480
A counter-antidote, to purge out the malignant effects of a late counterfeit, prepared by…
A counter-antidote, to purge out the malignant effects of a late counterfeit, prepared by Mr. Giles Shute ... being an answer to his vindication of his pretended Antidote to prevent the prevalency of Anabaptism, showing that Mr. Hercules Collins's reply to the said author remains unanswered : wherein the baptism of believers is evinced to be God's ordinance, and the baptized congregations proved true churches of Jesus Christ : with a further detection of the error of pedo-baptism : to which is added, An answer to Mr. Shute's reply to Mr. Collins's half-sheet / by Benjamin Keach.A counter-antidote, to purge out the malignant effects of a late counterfeit, prepared by Mr. Gyles Shute ... being an answer to his vindication of his pretended Antidote to prevent the prevalency of Anabaptism, shewing that Mr. Hercules Collins's reply to the said author remains unanswered : wherein the baptism of believers is evinced to be God's ordinance, and the baptized congregations proved true churches of Jesus Christ : with a further detection of the error of pedo-baptism : to which is added, An answer to Mr. Shute's reply to Mr. Collins's half-sheet / by Benjamin Keach.
London: printed for H. Bernard, 1694
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
2. Where is crossing in Baptism forbid, or Papists Salt Spittle, or Chrisom or other Popish rites? These in plain words are not forbid, are they therefore lawful? If Christ would have them to be Baptized, it would have been expressed in the affirmative; and is this horribly to impose our own uncouth notions as you affirm in the said 49. Page of your Book?
2. Where is crossing in Baptism forbid, or Popists Salt Spittle, or Crisom or other Popish rites? These in plain words are not forbid, are they therefore lawful? If Christ would have them to be Baptized, it would have been expressed in the affirmative; and is this horribly to impose our own uncouth notions as you affirm in the said 49. Page of your Book?
Where hath Christ forbid Baptizing of Turks, and Infidels, or the Children of unbelievers?
Where hath Christ forbid Baptizing of Turks, and Insidels, or the Children of unbelievers?
In Page 98. he says the Church of the Jews was not a legal Church, take his words, viz. the Church of God under the Mosaic Law was not a Carnal legal Church. Strange contradiction! What, a Church under the Law and not a legal Church? he may as well say the Church of God under the Gospel, is not a Gospel Church.
In Page 98. he says the Church of the Jews was not a legal Church, take his words, viz. the Church of God under the Mosaick Law was not a Carnal legal Church. Strange contradiction! What, a Church under the Law and not a legal Church? he may as well say the Church of God under the Gospel, is not a Gospel Church.