A47448:625
A counter-antidote, to purge out the malignant effects of a late counterfeit, prepared by…
A counter-antidote, to purge out the malignant effects of a late counterfeit, prepared by Mr. Giles Shute ... being an answer to his vindication of his pretended Antidote to prevent the prevalency of Anabaptism, showing that Mr. Hercules Collins's reply to the said author remains unanswered : wherein the baptism of believers is evinced to be God's ordinance, and the baptized congregations proved true churches of Jesus Christ : with a further detection of the error of pedo-baptism : to which is added, An answer to Mr. Shute's reply to Mr. Collins's half-sheet / by Benjamin Keach.A counter-antidote, to purge out the malignant effects of a late counterfeit, prepared by Mr. Gyles Shute ... being an answer to his vindication of his pretended Antidote to prevent the prevalency of Anabaptism, shewing that Mr. Hercules Collins's reply to the said author remains unanswered : wherein the baptism of believers is evinced to be God's ordinance, and the baptized congregations proved true churches of Jesus Christ : with a further detection of the error of pedo-baptism : to which is added, An answer to Mr. Shute's reply to Mr. Collins's half-sheet / by Benjamin Keach.
London: printed for H. Bernard, 1694
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Answer, In this he seems to charge the Holy God, who appointed and commanded circumcision, as if it was more like a punishment of criminals than an ordinance of God; as he calls Dipping of Believers in the Name, &c.
Answer, In this he seems to charge the Holy God, who appointed and commanded circumcision, as if it was more like a punishment of criminals than an ordinance of God; as he calls Di•ping of Believers in the Name, &c.
2. Was it from the pain that circumcision put the Infants to, that the Apostle calls it a Yoke, that neither they nor their Fathers could bear? or was it not rather because it lay them under an obligation to keep the whole Law? for our Apostle, so says in Gal. 5. 3. I testify again to every Man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole Law, compared with Rom. 2. 25.
2. Was it from the pain that circumcision put the Infants to, that the Apostle calls it a Yoke, that neither they nor their Fathers could bear? or was it not rather because it lay them under an obligation to keep the whole Law? for our Apostle, so says in Gal. 5. 3. I testifie again to every Man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole Law, compared with Rom. 2. 25.