The Baptists answer to Mr. Obed. Wills, his appeal against Mr. H. Danvers

II. You charge Coll' Danvers Appeal, p. 166. to add the words, [for it cannot be, that the Body should receive the Sacrament of Baptism till the Soul hath before received the truth of Faith] and say, they are not Jeromes Words, but of Mr. Danvers Adding: But upon Examination of that place [Mat. 28. Tom. 9. Edit. Paris. An. 1546.] we find them to be Jeromes Words Verbatim, as Mr. Danvers Cites them. And we observe in your Quotation of Mr. Danvers, in that place you add, [Magd. Cent. 4. c. 6. 418.] as if Mr. Danvers had particularly Quoted the Magd. there, which indeed he doth not; but only Jerome upon Matthew, which Double Injury we conceive ⟨p. 6⟩deserves your Double Consideration, in order to a Candid acknowledgement.

II. You charge Coll' Danvers Appeal, p. 166. to adde the words, [for it cannot be, that the Body should receive the Sacrament of Baptism till the Soul hath before received the truth of Faith] and say, they are not Jeroms Words, but of Mr. Danvers Adding: But upon Examination of that place [Mat. 28. Tom. 9. Edit. Paris. An. 1546.] we find them to be Jeroms Words Verbatim, as Mr. Danvers Cites them. And we observe in your Quotation of Mr. Danvers, in that place you add, [Magd. Cent. 4. c. 6. 418.] as if Mr. Danvers had particularly Quoted the Magd. there, which indeed he doth not; but only Jerom upon Mathew, which Double Injury we conceive ⟨p. 6⟩deserves your Double Consideration, in order to a Candid acknowledgment.

III. You charge him, p. 169. With abusing Calvin, fathering Estius's Words upon him, though he hath owned it a mistake in his Reply, But we observe also, That he Quotes Estius Annot.