A47576:243
The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts
The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts : first, proving the abrogation of the old seventh-day Sabbath : secondly, that the Lord's-Day is of divine appointment : containing several sermons newly preached upon a special occasion, wherein are many new arguments not found in former authors / by Benjamin Keach.The Jewish Sabbath abrogated, or, The Saturday Sabbatarians confuted in two parts : first, proving the abrogation of the old seventh-day Sabbath : secondly, that the Lord's-Day is of divine appointment : containing several sermons newly preach'd upon a special occasion, wherein are many new arguments not found in former authors / by Benjamin Keach.
London: printed by John Marshall, 1700
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
1. Such as through self-conceit are so fond of their own Apprehensions, that they resolve not to regard the strongest Arguments against what they believe: thus it is with some who have sucked in dangerous Errors; who if a Book be presented to them, presently cry, away with it, we will not read it: they are not like him that said, What I know not, teach thou me; nor like the great Apollos, who was ready to receive further Light by a poor Man and his Wife, much inferior to him both as to Parts, Knowledge, and Learning, Acts 18.
1. Such as thro self-conceit are so fond of their own Apprehensions, that they resolve not to regard the strongest Arguments against what they believe: thus it is with some who have sucked in dangerous Errors; who if a Book be presented to them, presently cry, away with it, we will not read it: they are not like him that said, What I know not, teach thou me; nor like the great Appollos, who was ready to receive further Light by a poor Man and his Wife, much inferior to him both as to Parts, Knowledg, and Learning, Acts 18.
2. The second sort are such as through the weakness of their Capacities are not able to take in the strength of an Argument; and therefore, let never so much be said, do intimate it is all little or nothing to them.
2. The second sort are such as thro the weakness of their Capacities are not able to take in the strength of an Argument; and therefore, let never so much be said, do intimate it is all little or nothing to them.
3. The third sort are such as seem indifferent whether they keep the seventh, or the first day,