A47591:1747
Light broke forth in Wales, expelling darkness, or, The Englishman's love to the ancient…Light broke forth in Wales, expelling darkness, or, The Englishman's love to the antient…
Light broke forth in Wales, expelling darkness, or, The Englishman's love to the ancient Britons [sic] being an answer to a book, intituled [sic] Children's baptism from Heaven, published in the Welsh tongue by Mr. James Owen / by Benjamin Keach.Light broke forth in Wales, expelling darkness, or, The Englishman's love to the antient Britains [sic] being an answer to a book, iutituled [sic] Children's baptism from Heaven, published in the Welsh tongue by Mr. James Owen / by Benjamin Keach.
London: printed by William Marshall, 1696
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Arg. 13. If no Parents at any time, or times, have been by God the Father, Jesus Christ, or his Apostles, either Commended for Baptizing their Children, or Reproved for neglecting to Baptize them, then Infant Baptism is no Ordinance of God; But no Parents at any time or times have been by God Commended for baptizing of their Children, nor reproved for neglecting to baptize them &c. Ergo Infant Baptism is no Ordinance of God.
Arg. 13. If no Parents at any time, or times, have been by God the Father, Jesus Christ, or his Apostles, either Commended for Baptizing their Children, or Reproved for neglecting to Baptize them, then Infant Baptism is no Ordinance of God; But no Parents at any time or times have been by God Commended for baptizing of their Children, nor reprov'd for neglecting to baptize them &c. Ergo Infant Baptism is no Ordinance of God.
This Argument will stand unanswerable, unless any can show who they were that were ever Commended for Baptizing their Children, or Reproved for neglecting it, or unless they can show a Parallel case.
This Argument will stand unanswerable, unless any can shew who they were that were ever Commended for Baptizing their Children, or Reproved for neglecting it, or unless they can shew a Parallel case.
Arg. 14. If Men were not to presume to alter any thing in the Worship of God under the Law, neither to add thereto, nor diminish therefrom, and God is as strict and jealous of his Worship under the Gospel, then nothing ought to be altered in God's Worship under ⟨p. 312⟩the Gospel; but under the Law Men were not to presume so to do, and God is as strict and jealous under the Gospel, Ergo.