A47605:238
The rector rectified and corrected, or, Infant-baptism unlawful being a sober answer to a…
The rector rectified and corrected, or, Infant-baptism unlawful being a sober answer to a late pamphlet entitled An argumentative and practical discourse of infant-baptism, published by Mr. William Burkit, rector of Mildin in Suffolk : wherein all his arguments for pedo-baptism are refuted and the necessity of immersion, i.e. dipping, is evidenced, and the people falsely called Anabaptists are cleared from those unjust reproaches and calumnies cast upon them : together with a reply to the Athenian gazette added to their 5th volume about infant-baptism : with some remarks upon Mr. John Flavel's last book in answer to Mr. Philip Cary / by Benjamin Keach.The rector rectified and corrected, or, Infant-baptism unlawful being a sober answer to a late pamphlet entituled An argumentative and practical discourse of infant-baptism, published by Mr. William Burkit, rector of Mildin in Suffolk : wherein all his arguments for pedo-baptism are refuted and the necessity of immersion, i.e. dipping, is evidenced, and the people falsly called Anabaptists are cleared from those unjust reproaches and calumnies cast upon them : together with a reply to the Athenian gazette added to their 5th volume about infant-baptism : with some remarks upon Mr. John Flavel's last book in answer to Mr. Philip Cary / by Benjamin Keach.
London: printed by John Harris, 1692
Title page typeset from the transcription.
THE Rector Rectified, and Corrected: OR, Infant-Baptism Unlawful. › Chapter 2
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Hence 'tis said to be a Yoke of Bondage, which neither they nor their Fathers could bear, Acts 15. because it obliged them to universal Obedience, or to keep the Law perfectly, and brought them under a Curse if they did not, Gal. 3.10.
Hence 'tis said to be a Yoke of Bondage, which neither they nor their Fathers could bear, Acts 15. because it obliged them to univer••l Obedience, or to keep the Law perfectly, and brought them under a Curse if they did not, Gal. 3.10.
These things considered, fully show of what stamp and nature Circumcision was, together with that Covenant to which it did appertain.
These things considered, fully shew of what stamp and nature Circumcision was, together with that Covenant to which it did appertain.
I come now to what you further assert in the 9th Page of your Book, viz.