A49255:274
The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin…
The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin and the privilege of the pardon of sin : together with a discourse of Christs ascension into heaven and of his coming again from heaven : wherein the opinion of the Chiliasts is considered and solidly confuted / being the sum and substance of several sermons preached by that faithful servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love ...The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin and the priviledge of the pardon of sin : together with a discourse of Christs ascension into heaven and of his coming again from heaven : wherein the opinion of the Chiliasts is considered and solidly confuted / being the sum and substance of several sermons preached by that faithful servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love ...
London: printed for John Rothwell, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Thirdly, He did plot Uriah's death, that so there might be no clamour on his part for the defilement of his wife.
Thirdly, He did plot Vriah's death, that so there might be no clamour on his part for the defilement of his wife.
Lastly, David would have fathered his plot on providence, for David himself had plotted the death of Uriah; mark Davids project: a good man did put his wits on work and made shifts to hide his sin; yet all this while did not put conscience on work to check him for his sin. O how near the suburbs of hell may a godly man go, and yet go to heaven!
Lastly, David would have fathered his plot on providence, for David himself had plotted the death of Vriah; mark Davids project: a good man did put his wits on work and made shifts to hide his sin; yet all this while did not put conscience on work to check him for his sin. O how near the suburbs of hell may a godly man go, and yet go to heaven!
Sixthly, This is the furthest step of all, take this for thy comfort, it is possible that the conscience of a pardoned sinner may not smite him for those very sins that a Heathen man by the light of a natural conscience may be ashamed of, and this is clear in the case of Abraham, Gen. 20. 9. Then Abimelech called Abraham, and said unto him, What hast thou done unto us, and what have Loffended thee, that thou hast brought on me, & on my kingdom a great sin? thou hast done deeds unto me, that ought not to be done. For this falsehood Abraham's conscience never smote him, yet a Heathen by the light of a natural conscience