A49255:347
The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin…
The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin and the privilege of the pardon of sin : together with a discourse of Christs ascension into heaven and of his coming again from heaven : wherein the opinion of the Chiliasts is considered and solidly confuted / being the sum and substance of several sermons preached by that faithful servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love ...The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin and the priviledge of the pardon of sin : together with a discourse of Christs ascension into heaven and of his coming again from heaven : wherein the opinion of the Chiliasts is considered and solidly confuted / being the sum and substance of several sermons preached by that faithful servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love ...
London: printed for John Rothwell, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
First of all consider, That God hath shown as much ⟨p. 74⟩displeasure against small and little sins, as against greater and grosser enormities: I will give you some instances.
First of all consider, That God hath shewn as much ⟨p. 74⟩displeasure against small and little sins, as against greater and grosser enormities: I will give you some instances.
First of the neglect of Moses to circumcise his son; one would think that for forbearing the circumcising of a child when a man was in a journey and had urgent business lying upon him, his business should have been a plea to excuse him: yet for the bare omission of that on the eight day, the Lord met him, and would have killed him, Exod 4. 24. And it came to pass by the way in the Jone, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him. Another time th• Psalmist tells us of Moses sin in the wilderness, Moses spake unadvisedly with his lips, only a rash word: and what was the issue of that sin? the Lord would never suffer Moses to enter into the land of Canaan.
First of the neglect of Moses to circumcise his son; one would think that for forbearing the circumcising of a childe when a man was in a journey and had urgent businesse lying upon him, his businesse should have been a plea to excuse him: yet for the bare omission of that on the eight day, the Lord met him, and would have killed him, Exod 4. 24. And it came to passe by the way in the Ione, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him. Another time th• Psalmist tels us of Moses sin in the wilderness, Moses spake unadvisedly with his lips, onely a rash word: and what was the issue of that sin? the Lord would never suffer Moses to enter into the land of Canaan.