A49255:363
The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin…
The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin and the privilege of the pardon of sin : together with a discourse of Christs ascension into heaven and of his coming again from heaven : wherein the opinion of the Chiliasts is considered and solidly confuted / being the sum and substance of several sermons preached by that faithful servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love ...The penitent pardoned a treatise wherein is handled the duty of confession of sin and the priviledge of the pardon of sin : together with a discourse of Christs ascension into heaven and of his coming again from heaven : wherein the opinion of the Chiliasts is considered and solidly confuted / being the sum and substance of several sermons preached by that faithful servant of Christ, Mr. Christopher Love ...
London: printed for John Rothwell, 1657
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Sixthly and lastly, There was murder in this sin, for Adam killed himself and all his posterity; For by one man sin entered into the World and death by sin, 1so that in him all ⟨p. 76⟩have sinned, and so all dyed: therefore Adams sin was so clothed with heinous aggravations, that made it very great.
Sixthly and lastly, There was murder in this sin, for Adam kill'd himselfe and all his posterity; For by one man sin entred into the World and death by sin, 1so that in him all ⟨p. 76⟩have sinned, and so all dyed: therfore Adams sin was so cloathed with hainous aggravations, that made it very great.
Look on Davids sin in numbering the people, it was a very small sin, and indeed interpreters justify the fact, in it self it was no sin for a King to number his Army; yet there were some circumstances with which this fact was clothed, that made Davids fact very sinful: there were six heinous aggravations in that fact of Davids numbering the people.
Look on Davids sin in numbring the people, it was a very small sin, and indeed interpreters justifie the fact, in it selfe it was no sin for a King to number his Army; yet there were some circumstances with which this fact was cloathed, that made Davids fact very sinfull: there were six hainous aggravations in that fact of Davids numbring the people.