A49256:130
Short and plain animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dells sermon first preached before…Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before…
Short and plain animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dells sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annexed to the sermon, entitled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.Short and plaine animadversions on some passages in Mr. Dels sermon first preached before the Honourable House of Commons on Novemb. 25. 1646. But since printed without their order Setting forth the many dangerous and destructive assertions therein both to church and state, the covenant, and the reformation so much desired. Together, with an answer to an unlicensed pamphlet annext to the sermon, entituled, A reply to Master Loves contradictions. By Christopher Love minister of Anne Aldersgate, London. The second edition. Imprimatur Ja. Cranford. Decemb. 17. 1646.
London: printed by R. Cotes for John Bellamie, 1647London: printed by R. Cotes for Iohn Bellamie, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
A Short ANSWER to an Unlicensed Pamphlet, entitled, A Reply to the chief Contradictions of Master LOVE'S Sermon.
A Short ANSWER to an Vnlicensed Pamphlet, entituled, A Reply to the chiefe Contradictions of Master LOVE'S Sermon.
Master DELL,
I Little thought, that you who pretend so much to be guided by the law of Love, and of the Spirit, would have brought forth such fruits of the flesh. The best word you can afford me (who never spake ill word of you in my life) is, Satan, the Old man, the false Prophet, &c. Well, your words shall provoke me to a diligent search in mine own soul, but not to a turbulent passion against your person, what ever you say of me shall not exasperate me to bring a railing accusation against you. The truth is, I am exceedingly unwilling to show your nakedness to the world, for men to see your shame, and were it not that the truth of God is more concerned then my self, I shou•d be silent; I cannot but say with the Philosopher, Amicus Plato, amicus Socrates, sed magis amica v•ritas. Before I shall speak to your reply, I cannot but take notice of one passage in the Title of your Book, viz.1